Article date – 16 November 2018

The 27-year-old from Thatto Heath was ordered to pay a total of £636 after being found guilty in her absence at Liverpool, Knowsley and St Helens Magistrates’ Court of failing to have her dog’s microchip details updated, as prescribed by the Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015.

The court heard how the woman’s dog was seized as a stray dog in February 2018 and on  claiming her dog from St Helens Council’s Dog Welfare and Enforcement Service, she was served with a notice under section 12 (a) of the The Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015 requiring her to update the details of her dog’s microchip within 21 days.

She failed to comply despite being served with a ‘Final Opportunity to Comply’ notice which effectively gives a dog owner an extra seven days to meet the requirements of the legislation.

Last Friday (9 November) she was fined £220, with costs of £386. She was also ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £30.

Welcoming the outcome, St Helens Council’s Cabinet Member for Better Neighbourhoods, Councillor Lynn Clarke, said: “Before the microchipping law came into effect over two years ago now, dog owners were given enough notice about the change in legislation, and the council even carried out microchipping for free – so there can be no excuses.

“Well done to our Dog Welfare and Enforcement Service for pursuing this case which I hope will act as a costly reminder that we will always look to prosecute dog owners who fail to ensure their pet is registered at their home address.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here